Nicole Brandt

I think the better investor is Mark Cuban, because he is a very hands on investor and would help a lot in getting a company turned around beneficially. To be a great investor you need to be hands on, because the business won't be able to get to its full potential as fast as it could have been with a hands on investor. Marcus Lemonis is a hands on investor, but I feel like he would put more emphasis on his show than bettering the company he is working on. The show is full of drama. While this is entertaining, I'm not sure if it necessarily is worth getting your company to the top. I'd say Mark Cuban is the better investor, because he would help with the hands-on approach without the hassle of drama.

With the product I have created I would rather work with Daymond John because my product is a self improvement app that helps set daily and long term goals for customers. Daymond John is very invested in setting goals for himself because he thinks everything can be accomplished, but only if you have the right time management and if you know your goals. This goal orientated app was based on how much Daymond John emphasized the importance it was to think about your goals in life. I feel like he would be the best person to invest in it, because he has the same ideas.

One major difference between Marcus Lemonis and the investors on Shark Tank are that Marcus tells/makes a plan for what the companies should do with the money he gives them and the sharks give them money, but mostly the companies are on their own.

Nicole Brandt 

Daymond John